compare
Every list of the best free project management software is arranged the wrong way round. It ranks the tools and then mentions the limits, when the limits are the only thing that decides the outcome. A tool with a generous free plan that caps at two seats is useless to a team of six, no matter how good the product is. A tool that allows unlimited people but 60 MB of storage will work fine until somebody attaches a video. The useful question is not which free plan is best. It is which cap a specific team will hit first, and how much the step past it costs.
What follows was read off each vendor's own pricing page on 27 September 2026. Prices exclude tax, and free plans change often enough that anything quoted here is worth re-checking before a decision rests on it.
Once the marketing language is set aside, every free tier in this category is limited in one or more of four ways, and the four behave completely differently.
Seats. The number of people who can be in the workspace at all. This is the hardest cap because a team cannot work around it. Either everyone is in or the tool is not being used.
Objects. Boards, projects, spaces, docs. Softer than a seat cap, because work can be consolidated, but consolidation has a cost: a board holding three projects is harder to read and harder to hand over than three boards.
Capacity. Storage, automation runs, email notifications, version history. These limits arrive quietly, weeks in, usually at the worst moment. A file upload that fails is more disruptive than a limit that was visible on day one.
Features. Timeline views, reporting, guest access, permissions. The most common upsell, and the one where free plans differ most from each other. One tool gives away its timeline view on the free plan while another puts it two tiers up.
The reason this matters more than a ranking is that these four caps cannot be traded against each other. A team of eight cannot use a tool capped at two seats, whatever else that tool includes. Everything else in this article follows from sorting by the cap that binds first.
| Tool | People on the free plan | Objects | Capacity | Notable features on free |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jira | 10 users per site | Unlimited work items, 1 site | 2 GB storage, 150 automation steps per month, 100 emails per day | Backlog, list, board, timeline, calendar and summary views, reports and insights, customizable workflows, custom fields, unlimited forms |
| Trello | 10 collaborators per Workspace | Up to 10 boards per Workspace, unlimited cards | Unlimited storage with a 10 MB per file limit, 250 Workspace command runs per month | Unlimited Power-Ups per board, unlimited activity log, iOS and Android apps, two factor authentication |
| ClickUp | Unlimited free plan members | Unlimited tasks, 1 form | 60 MB storage | Kanban boards, calendar view, collaborative docs, sprint management, in app video recording, basic custom fields |
| Notion | Free for individuals, with pages and blocks limited for two or more members | Unlimited published pages, 1 notion.site domain | 5 MB per file upload, 7 days of page history, 10 external guests | Databases with subtasks and dependencies, custom properties, basic forms, Notion Calendar, 1 chart |
| Asana | Up to 2 seats per project and team | Unlimited tasks and projects | Unlimited storage with a 100 MB per file limit | List, board and calendar views, unlimited comments, 100 or more free integrations |
| monday.com | Up to 2 seats | Up to 3 boards, up to 3 docs | Not stated on the pricing page | 200 or more templates, 8 column types, iOS and Android apps |
Reading that table by team size rather than by brand changes the answer sharply. For one or two people, almost everything on the list works, and the choice comes down to taste. From three people up, Asana's Personal plan and monday.com's Free plan stop being options, because both cap at two seats. From eleven people up, Jira's free tier and Trello's free tier both run out. ClickUp is the only one here with no seat cap at all on its free plan, and it pays for that with 60 MB of storage, which is a few dozen screenshots.
Teams underestimate this because the number they count is the number of people doing the work. The number that gets billed is usually larger.
Three groups get forgotten. Stakeholders who only read. A manager who wants to look at the board once a week still occupies a seat on most plans, unless that plan has a viewer or guest tier. Outside collaborators. A client, a contractor, a freelance designer. Free plans rarely include guest access: Jira's pricing page lists free guest access from Standard, and Asana lists unlimited free guests from Starter. People who joined to comment once. They stay in the seat count until somebody removes them, and nobody removes them.
The practical consequence is that a team of six often needs nine or ten seats, which means a free plan capped at ten is tighter than it looks, and a free plan capped at two never applied at all.
Two ways of counting are worth looking for specifically when comparing plans, because they change the bill by a lot. The first is whether read only people are counted. The second is whether guests on a single board are counted differently from full members. Trello's pricing page, for instance, states that a guest on more than one board within a Workspace is billed at the same rate as a member, while single board guests appear on the Standard tier. Details at that level of specificity are the ones that decide whether a plan is affordable at twelve people, and they are never in the headline.
Across this category, four things are the usual first paid upgrade. Knowing which one a team actually needs is the difference between paying $5 per person and paying $11.
Timeline and Gantt views. Held back the most often. Jira includes a timeline view on its free plan. Trello lists Timeline under Premium, its third tier. Asana lists Timeline and Gantt views from Starter. ClickUp lists unlimited Gantt charts from Unlimited, its second tier. monday.com lists Timeline and Gantt views from Standard, its third tier.
Reporting and dashboards. Jira lists reports and insights on Free. Trello lists Dashboard view under Premium. Asana lists reporting dashboards from Starter. ClickUp lists unlimited dashboards with advanced cards from Business, its third tier. Notion limits the free plan to one chart.
Guest and external access. Covered above, and the one that most often forces an upgrade for agencies and any team working with clients.
Automation. Usually metered rather than absent. Trello's free plan lists 250 Workspace command runs per month, Jira's lists 150 automation steps per subscription per month. Both are enough to try the idea and not enough to depend on it.
The point of listing them this way is that the correct free plan depends on which of the four a team cannot work without. A team that reports upward every fortnight and needs a timeline has a very different shortlist from a team of contractors who need guest access.
Free plans are a way of deciding, not a destination. It is worth knowing the number before starting, because it is the number that arrives in month four.
| Tool and tier | Per user, billed annually | Per user, billed monthly | Eight people, annual rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trello Standard | $5 | $6 | $40 per month |
| ClickUp Unlimited | $7 | $10 | $56 per month |
| Notion Plus | $10 | $12 | $80 per month |
| Asana Starter | $10.99 | $13.49 | $87.92 per month |
Two things in that table are easy to miss. The gap between the cheapest and the most expensive first step is more than twice, for tools that a shortlist usually treats as interchangeable. And paying monthly rather than annually costs 20 percent more per user on Trello and Notion, 23 percent more on Asana and 43 percent more on ClickUp, which means committing annually to the wrong tool still costs more than paying monthly for a year while deciding.
There is also a downgrade question worth asking before any trial. Trello's pricing page states that when a Workspace downgrades, it keeps its paid features until the end of the prepaid period and then becomes a free Workspace that can hold 10 boards. Knowing what happens to work above the free cap when a subscription ends is the kind of thing nobody checks until it matters.
The usual mistake is to evaluate a tool by setting up a clean project in it. Clean projects work in everything. The evaluation has to be done with work that is already messy.
Four steps make a week enough.
Move one real project, not a sample. Including the awkward parts: the task nobody owns, the dependency on an external party, the item that has been open for three months. Tools differ most in how they handle the things that do not fit.
Add every person who would really be in it, including the read only manager and the outside contractor. This is the step that finds the seat cap on day two instead of week six, and it is the step most often skipped because it feels like a favour to ask.
Run one real reporting cycle. Whatever gets sent upward every fortnight, produce it from the tool. If that requires a paid tier, better to find out now.
Attach the files people actually attach. A design mockup, a screen recording, a PDF from a client. A 60 MB total or a 5 MB per file limit is abstract until a real file bounces off it.
At the end of the week, the question is not whether the team liked it. It is which cap was hit and what the next tier costs.
Three things matter for the life of a tool and are invisible during a free trial, so they have to be checked deliberately.
How the data gets out. Every tool imports enthusiastically. Exports vary. The question to answer before a team has a year of history in something is what a full export contains: whether comments and attachments come with it, whether the format is readable by anything else, and whether it is available on the free plan at all. Notion's comparison table, for instance, lists workspace export as HTML, Markdown and CSV on Free, with PDF export of the whole workspace on a paid tier. A tool whose export is a proprietary file is a tool that is hard to leave.
What support looks like when it is needed. Free plans commonly route to community forums rather than to a person, which is fine right up to the day a workspace admin leaves the company and nobody can get in. This is not an argument for paying. It is an argument for knowing, before it is urgent, whether there is a way to reach anybody.
Whether it works on a phone properly. Not whether an app exists, which it does for all of these, but whether the specific thing a team does daily works on a small screen. Dragging a card across a Gantt chart on a phone is a different experience from ticking a checklist, and one of those is what half a team will actually do.
None of these three show up in a feature comparison. All three cost more to discover late than any monthly price difference on the list above.
Count the real number of people who need access, including read only stakeholders and anyone outside the company, and use that number to cut the shortlist before looking at any feature list. Then name the one feature the team cannot work without, usually a timeline view or reporting, and check which tier holds it. If the answer is that a timeline and reporting sit two tiers above free, it is worth comparing against tools that cap on size rather than on features, and Pinateca publishes where its own line sits.
ClickUp's Free Forever plan lists unlimited free plan members, which is the most generous seat allowance in this group, though it comes with 60 MB of storage. Jira's free plan allows 10 users per site and Trello's allows 10 collaborators per Workspace. Asana's Personal plan and monday.com's Free plan both cap at 2 seats, so neither applies to a team.
The plans listed here are ongoing free tiers rather than time limited trials, which is different from the free trial of a paid tier that most vendors also offer. What matters more than the word free is what happens at the cap: a plan that simply stops letting new people in behaves very differently from one that locks existing work.
The seat count, more often than any feature. A team of six typically needs nine or ten seats once read only stakeholders and outside collaborators are included, and free plans rarely include guest access. After seats, the most common triggers are a timeline or Gantt view and a reporting dashboard, both of which sit one to two tiers above free in most tools.
Paying monthly costs 20 percent more per user on Trello and Notion, 23 percent more on Asana and 43 percent more on ClickUp, but annual billing commits a team to a tool before it has run a full quarter in it. Paying monthly for the first few months and switching to annual once the choice is settled usually costs less overall than committing annually to the wrong tool.
About a week, provided the evaluation uses a real project rather than a sample one, and provided every person who would really need access is added, including read only managers and external collaborators. Testing with a clean project and three enthusiastic people gives a positive result for almost every tool on the market.